"The Dilemma of the Domestic Violence Victim What Cooperative Witnesses Should -- and Shouldn't Do" by Mark J. Sullivan
|Posted on June 10th, 2015 by Admin istrator|
The Dilemma of the Domestic Violence Victim What Cooperative Witnesses Should -- and Shouldn't Do
By Mark J. Sullivan (deceased)
More often than not, alleged victims in domestic violence (DV) cases do not want to cooperate with the prosecution. Sometimes, it's because they don't want the defendant to go to prison or jail. Other times, it is because they lied at the time of the incident, and they fear perjury or obstruction charges of their own. Usually, they call the DA's office and ask to "drop the charges." Quickly and bluntly they are told that they are not a party to the case, and that the charges are not theirs to press or drop.
In that instance, the DA's office is exactly right. They decide which cases are prosecuted and which are dismissed. However, although DV victims are not parties, they are witnesses, and usually critical witnesses to a successful prosecution. DV witnesses who wish to cooperate with the defense need to know several things:
1. They must show up in court ONLY if they are lawfully subpoenaed
2. They must testify ONLY if the judge instructs them to do so
3. They don't have to worry about winning or losing the case
4. If forced to testify, they must tell the absolute truth. Contrary to what the DA's office will tell them, they are NEVER required to go to the DA's office, only the courtroom listed on the subpoena, and they are NEVER obliged to cooperate with the DA. But DV witnesses are just like any other witnesses, so if they are ordered to testify, they must tell the absolute truth. Sometimes the truth is consistent with what is in the police report, oftentimes it is not.
Sometimes, a cooperative witness in a DV case asks me to help them lie to help the accused. Not only do I not encourage them to lie, I will not tolerate it. When a witness lies, even if they think that it is for a very good reason, they are committing perjury, a felony. More importantly, if a DV victim lies to the jury, it will probably backfire on them. That is because when a jury thinks that if a victim is lying, they blame the defendant for "controlling" the witness.
Lastly, witnesses do not win cases. They shouldn't take sides, present theories, or try to persuade a jury. It is the lawyer's job to present the truth in a light most favorable to the defendant, and to persuade the jury to do the right thing. Good lawyers win DV cases despite the complainant testifying "against" the defendant, because the jury has a right to know everything, including the witnesses' motivation. Many times victims will testify about unscrupulous prosecutors threatening to take their children away or prosecuting them as unfit parents. Oftentimes, witnesses will complain that the prosecutor threatened them to testify consistent with the police report or face perjury charges. When a jury hears this, they invariably do the right thing. My instructions to DV victims is to consult with the defense attorney to prepare their direct testimony, and their cross examination, and then to answer all questions truthfully, including their motivations and attitude toward the giving of testimony. While juries usually do not ignore the judge's instructions and blindly vote not guilty, knowledge of the motivations and attitude of the victim will cause them to do the right thing, because their decision will be based upon truthful, not perjured testimony.
More often than not, alleged victims in domestic violence (DV) cases do not want to cooperate with the prosecution
Contrary to what the DA's office will tell them, they are NEVER required to go to the DA's office, and they are NEVER obliged to cooperate with the DA
Lastly, witnesses do not win cases
Mark Sullivan was a practicing criminal attorney in Riverside County CA and a regular contributor to Crime, Justice & America magazine. He passed away a few years ago and is missed by many.
|0 Response(s) to : "The Dilemma of the Domestic Violence Victim What Cooperative Witnesses Should -- and Shouldn't Do" by Mark J. Sullivan|
Motions are one of the most important aspects of a criminal case before getting to trial. Kirk Tarman, criminal defense attorney in San Bernardino County CA, discusses suppression motions based upon the 4th Amendment, dismissal motions, discovery motions, and more... for a glimpse into the preparation of a criminal case. ….
Andrew Dosa, a civil and criminal defense attorney located in Alameda County CA, when interviewed by Crime and Justice Online, explains everything you need to know about restitution in criminal cases. What is restitution? Is it to punish the guilty or help the victim? Is it always paid? What happens if it is not paid? Are all criminal charges associated with restitution? Can you use restitution to bargain away a jail sentence? Is it applied more in civil or criminal cases? These questions and more are answered by our expert on restitution, Andrew Dosa….
Here is an entertaining and informative interview with Wally Farrell, a premier criminal defense attorney in Riverside County, now deceased, who discussed the Death Penalty in California with Crime, Justice & America Talk Show Host Ray Hrdlicka. Is it really a deterrent? Why represent defendants charged with this type of crime? What is “special circumstances” in the crime? Life without parole vs. the Death Penalty. Why does this type of case last so long? Is it a choice between Justice or a Political and Financial cost? Does it demean life? Or does it demean the death of victims?