A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(http://webs3.xindesigns.com/CJASrv/?signature=882e91b81f2b442c95c7dfe5ab0ee5b7&interface=getzipcode&ip= failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error

Filename: models/helpermodel.php

Line Number: 288

Crime.Justice & America - Your Criminal Court Case - Step by Step - "The Felony Process in Illinois" by David J. Shestokas

"Better education means better justice. Better education means a higher standard for government to insure proper prosecution and incarceration. Better education means reduced recidivism, and in turn, less financial burden on society".

 "The Felony Process in Illinois" by David J. Shestokas

The Felony Process in Illinois

David J. Shestokas, Attorney at Law

Since 1994 when I became an Assistant State’s Attorney for Cook County, I have been involved with persons charged by the State with violating the law. The system is at once complex and simple. It is complex when it is only looked at in bits and pieces. It is simple when there is an overview that provides how each part of the process works with the other. This article is intended as an overview, so that an individual charged with a crime can gauge where in the process his case stands, and what steps are still to come.         

There are principally three types of crimes in Illinois. The lowest level of violation of law is a petty offense. This type of violation can be punished only by the imposition of a fine. The next level is a misdemeanor. In Illinois these can range from a Class C which carries a maximum of 30 days in jail and a $1500 fine to a Class A with a range of up to 364 days in jail and a $2,500 fine. Following that are the felonies.

The level of crime is determined by the maximum allowable sentence. A felony is a serious crime that has a possible prison term of 1 year or more.   The lowest level felony in Illinois is a Class 4 felony. The most serious felony in Illinois is a Class X, which may have a prison term of up to 60 years. While there are significant differences in penalties, the process for all felony charges is the same.

The Arrest

When the police arrest someone and believe a felony should be charged, they call the State’s Attorney’s Felony Review Office.  A police officer does not have the authority on his own to decide to charge a person with a felony. That decision belongs to the State’s Attorney.

The Felony Review office runs 24 hours a day 7 days a week. The arresting officer calls the State’s Attorney on duty. That State’s Attorney gathers information from the officer regarding the evidence in the case and the defendant’s criminal history.  In some cases the Attorney conducts an interview of the defendant. After conducting his own review of the case and the evidence the State’s Attorney then decides if felony charges are proper.

If the State’s Attorney believes the evidence is insufficient or the circumstances do not call for a felony, and felony charges are rejected. This can happen for any number of reasons depending upon the crime involved. If the State’s Attorney rejects felony charges, the police do have the authority to still file misdemeanor charges.

If the State’s Attorney believes the evidence warrants felony charges, then those charges are filed. These charges are sent to court and the defendant is processed by the police for the felony. At this point the charges are outlined in a document called an information.   At this point the defendant is held for a bond hearing.

The Bond Hearing

Within 72 hours after a felony arrest, the accused is taken before a judge to set a bond. The bond court judge hears the charges and some basic facts related to the case. The bond court judge is also provided with the criminal history of the defendant.

Attorneys for the defendant make a presentation on his behalf. This generally relates to elements of the person’s life. These can include: age, education, family situation, work history and resources for posting bond. After hearing from both sides the judge decides the terms of the defendant’s release, whether it is by personal recognizance (I-Bond) or by posting with the court an amount of money (D-Bond).

These terms can also include special conditions such as not contacting an alleged victim, staying away from a specific location, not leaving the state of Illinois or surrendering any weapons that person may possess.

The Preliminary Hearing

After the arrest and bond hearing, the case is usually scheduled for a preliminary hearing. In many counties this scheduling is a formality to keep the process moving. Although a hearing has been scheduled, it often does not take place, since the case is likely to be indicted by a grand jury. That will be discussed in the next section.

If a preliminary hearing is held, and they are typically held in Cook County for drug cases, it will proceed in the following fashion:

A judge hears evidence to determine two matters. First, was a crime committed? Second, is there reason to believe the person accused committed this crime?  For this purpose the state presents witnesses, and the defense has the right to ask questions of the state’s witnesses. These witnesses provide evidence to the judge on the two issues above. The standard of proof is much lower than the “beyond a reasonable doubt” that exists at a trial, the question before the judge at a preliminary hearing is simply whether the answer to the two questions is likely true.

This is an important part of the process. If the defendant wins the preliminary hearing, the judge says there is no probable cause for the charges, and usually the case is over. Even if the defendant loses the hearing, an experienced lawyer can bring out very important evidence. The chance to ask the police officers questions while they are under oath is useful to the defense. A record is kept of the hearing including the officer’s testimony.  This record can be used later in defending the case in many ways.   It is important to have a lawyer for this hearing.

The Indictment

Instead of having a preliminary hearing, the state can charge a person with a felony by presenting evidence to a Grand Jury.  This consists of 18 people from the community. The State’s Attorney presents evidence to these 18 people. The proceedings are conducted in secret, and the defense does not get the chance to ask questions of the witnesses. Most felony cases actually proceed in this fashion.

The Grand Jury looks at the same two issues as a judge at a preliminary hearing: Was there a crime?   Is there reason to believe a specific individual is responsible?

If after the Grand Jury hears the evidence and the jurors agree there was a crime, likely committed by a particular individual an indictment is issued. This is the document that officially accuses the person of a crime.

In this situation there will not be a preliminary hearing.   If the defendant is not in custody, or currently on bond, a warrant will be issued for his arrest.

Assignment to Trial Court

When someone is arrested and charged with a felony, if there has been a finding of probable cause at a preliminary hearing or an indictment, the case is then typically sent to the Chief Judge of the county. The Chief Judge then with a proscribed random process assigns the case to another judge in the county. This judge is the one who will be looking after the case as it now progresses toward one of three outcomes: a plea, a dismissal or a trial.


After assignment to a trial court, the defendant is formally told of the charges against him. A defendant can require that the judge reads the indictment in open court, but this formality it usually waived or given up. A copy of the charging document (the indictment if from a grand jury or an information is from a preliminary hearing) is given to the defendant or his lawyer. It is at this point that a formal plea of not guilty is entered in open court.


This is the process by which the state must provide to the accused the evidence that it has against him. For felony cases the requirements are basically set up by way of a case from the United States Supreme Court. This case is called Brady v. Maryland. The State is required to provide certain specific types of evidence in its possession.

Though all the evidence in the case is important, the specific evidence that the state must provide that has large implications is if the state has any evidence that might show the defendant is not guilty. There are penalties against the state for failing to reveal this type of evidence. Gathering this evidence is extremely important to the defense.


A Motion is a request by an attorney asking the judge to order that something be done. Some motions, if successful, such as Motion to Quash Arrest, Motion to Suppress Evidence, Motion to Suppress Statement, can result in the case being dismissed.

These motions are part of the pre-trial process. The outcome of these requests to a judge to issue an order can have a large impact on the case. As mentioned above, certain motions can result in a dismissal, and some motions, though not resulting in a dismissal, can provide the defense with leverage to have a more favorable plea offer. Experienced lawyers keep an eye on the case and the evidence to determine if there are important motions to be made that affect their client’s freedom.

Plea Agreement

This is when the State’s Attorney, defense attorney and defendant agree what penalty will be imposed if the defendant pleads guilty to the crime. It is important to note that such an agreement required the approval of the defendant. These penalties are usually based upon the offense and the defendant’s background both criminal and social.

Often the trial judge also participates in the agreement. This is the result of something known as a 402 conference. The name comes from Illinois Supreme Court Rule 402, which provides for a judge to be part of a plea negotiation. If the judge participates because of a 402 conference, then the penalty will be as agreed in the conference.

If the judge was not part of the negotiations, then he may impose a different penalty than agreed by the state and defense. For this to happen is very rare, but it is important for a defendant to know this is possible.

Many cases are finished in this fashion, and an experienced lawyer knows what the usual penalties are for specific situations. In that way he can arrange for the best possible outcome for his client.


In the event that there is no agreement in return for a plea, (or the case is not dismissed by way of a motion) then a trial is held, and the defendant maintains his plea of not guilty. At trial the state presents evidence to either a judge (bench trial) or a jury.

A jury is composed of twelve citizens chosen by the state and the defense through a process of voir dire. These twelve people decide, by unanimous vote if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the charges.

The state must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If this does not happen, the defendant is found not guilty and the case is over. If it does happen, then the defendant will have a penalty imposed by the judge who presided at the trial.


Possible Felony Terms of Imprisonment

Illinois has defined felonies in five classes.



Minimum Prison


Maximum Prison


Possible Extended Term

Period of Mandatory Supervised Release (Parole)


6 years

30 years

60 years

3 years


4 years

15 years

30 years

2 years


3 years

7 years

14 years

2 years


2 years

5 years

10 years

1 year


1 year

3 years

6 years

1 year

This entry was posted in Your Criminal Court Case - Step by Step.
0 Response(s) to : "The Felony Process in Illinois" by David J. Shestokas
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Name *
Email *
    Search our content
Follow Us:
Listen To The Experts
Kirk Tarman discusses criminal case motions
Posted on June 16th, 2015 by Admin istrator

Motions are one of the most important aspects of a criminal case before getting to trial.  Kirk Tarman, criminal defense attorney in San Bernardino County CA, discusses suppression motions based upon the 4th Amendment, dismissal motions, discovery motions, and more... for a glimpse into the preparation of a criminal case. ….

Continue reading →
Andrew Dosa discusses restitution
Posted on June 16th, 2015 by Admin istrator

Andrew Dosa, a civil and criminal defense attorney located in Alameda County CA, when interviewed by Crime and Justice Online, explains everything you need to know about restitution in criminal cases.  What is restitution?  Is it to punish the guilty or help the victim? Is it always paid?  What happens if it is not paid?  Are all criminal charges associated with restitution?  Can you use restitution to bargain away a jail sentence?  Is it applied more in civil or criminal cases?  These questions and more are answered by our expert on restitution, Andrew Dosa….

Continue reading →
Wally Farrell, a criminal defense attorney in Riverside County, now deceased, discussed the Death Penalty in California with Ray Hrdlicka
Posted on June 16th, 2015 by Admin istrator

Here is an entertaining and informative interview with Wally Farrell, a premier criminal defense attorney in Riverside County, now deceased, who discussed the Death Penalty in California with Crime, Justice & America Talk Show Host Ray Hrdlicka.  Is it really a deterrent? Why represent defendants charged with this type of crime?  What is “special circumstances” in the crime?  Life without parole vs. the Death Penalty.  Why does this type of case last so long?  Is it a choice between Justice or a Political and Financial cost?  Does it demean life? Or does it demean the death of victims?

Continue reading →

Recent Polls

Advertise with CJA
Why should Attorneys advertise with Crime, Justice & America Magazine?

Why Should Bail Agents Advertise with Crime, Justice & America Magazine?

Government and Community Resource Information

Copyright © 2019 www.crimejusticeandamerica.com. All Rights Reserved.